Subluxation Fact or Fiction
Men who used ED meds have reported cases of blurry vision and blue-tinged vision with altered light perception. bulk cialis It completely changes a person’s life and it cialis on line purchase affects both young as well as old men. L-Arginine, L-Phenylalanine, Hygrophila spinosa, Argyreia speciosa, Mucuna pruriens and Tribulus terrestris which cialis samples have the efficacy in curing exhaustion caused by too much self-stimulation. Citrulline is absorbed very quickly in the body as it rejuvenates and uplifts best prices on sildenafil the whole system.
The “Chiropractic Subluxation” is a scientifically indefensible concept that many chiropractors use as the basis of their philosophy and also as a marketing ploy. This nonsensical belief system proposes that Subluxations (joint dysfunctions) stop the flow of “Innate Energy” and are deleterious to human health. Because of its non-falsifiable nature This construct is more of a belief system than a “theory”. The Following articles discuss the preposterous notions that the subluxation theory posits and also exemplifies the negative effects this dogma propagates across chiropractic as a whole.
Essential Literature
SUBLUXATION DOGMA OR SCIENCE?
Joseph Keating et al. 2005
Conclusion:
The dogma of subluxation is perhaps the greatest single barrier to professional development for chiropractors. It skews the practice of the art in directions that bring ridicule from the scientific community and uncertainty among the public.
John W Reggars 2011
Conclusion:
The CAA and ASRF continue their search for the “holy grail” of evidence to support their subluxation based ideology, but they, and their international counterparts, have failed to produce any worthwhile evidence that subluxations actually exist, let alone adversely impact on a person’s health or well-being. Nor have they shown that removal of such an entity has any positive impact on health.
Craig Nelson 1997
Conclusion:
Whether chiropractors are actually treating lesions, or not, is a question of immense clinical and professional consequence. Resolution will not be found through consensus panels nor through semantic tinkering, but through proposing and testing relevant hypotheses.
David Seaman, Jonathan Soltys 2013
Conclusion:
The Medicare version of chiropractic practice is not consistent with traditional straight chiropractic philosophy, which may play a role in preventing Medicare compliance. The chiropractic profession may need to consider the fashion in which “philosophy” as it relates to technique and practice is presented to students and doctors to facilitate compliance with the documentation requirements of Medicare.
J Keith Simpson 2012
Conclusion:
This paper has explored these issues and suggested a way for the profession to proceed as a united group. This author would not be willing to wager on a unified future, but does know this: the future of the chiropractic profession is well and truly in its own hands and the time to act is now.
Richard Brown 2010
Conclusion:
An orthopedic subluxation, a true vertebral misalignment, or a mechanical joint dysfunction that affects mobility in the spine is not the same as a “chiropractic subluxation” that is alleged to cause disease by interfering with nerve supply to organs. Such a subluxation has never been proven to exist. There is no plausible theory and no credible evidence to support the contention that “nerve interference” originating in a single spinal segment can cause an organic disease.
Howard Vernon 2010
Conclusion:
The “subluxation concept” currently faces challenges, which are briefly reviewed in this article. The only way forward is to strengthen our efforts to investigate the “subluxation concept” with high-quality scientific studies including animal models and human clinical studies.
Timothy A Mirtz et al. 2009
Conclusion:
There is a significant lack of evidence to fulfill the basic criteria of causation. This lack of crucial supportive epidemiologic evidence prohibits the accurate promulgation of the chiropractic subluxation.
Gregory Cramer et al. 2006
Conclusion:
The summaries of the literature for the 6 topic sections (anatomy, biomechanics, somatic nervous system, animal models, immune system, and human studies related to the autonomic nervous system) indicated that a significant body of basic science research evaluating chiropractic spinal adjusting has been completed and published.